All
the postcolonial approaches mentioned above in one way or another assist and
support the postcolonial reading in order to retrieve and liberate the Mara
primal religion out of the folds of the western colonial mission paradigm.
Firstly,
when the missionaries branded the Mara primal religion as animism, there was a
concrete element of worshipping the Supreme Being in the Mara traditional
religion. Therefore, Mara traditional religion cannot be categorized as animism
even though it was far from perfect and a more appropriate categorization
should be ‘henotheism’.
Secondly,
all postcolonial approaches retrieve the revelation of God to the Mara people
and this confirmed that the Mara traditional religion was a religion of
epiphany, revelation of God to human beings out of Mara primal religion.
Thirdly,
the concept of Supreme Being and celestial god, and the concept of Khazohno,
Paw Khazo pave the way to accept the classical Christian doctrine of
trinity. Moreover, the concept of guardian spirit also helps the understanding
of angels in the Bible and it reveals the close relationship of human beings to
supernatural beings.
Fourthly,
the concept of life after death and peihrâh expectation enabled the
Maras to accept the concept of heaven in Christianity without much difficulty
although the purpose might be slightly different.
With
respect to the traditional Mara culture, the following points are vital: the
administration of the chief and council of elders in the village, the function
and and how the apiepasaihna hro shaped the Mara community life. It is
worthwhile to point out that the concept of chieftainship later contributed to
the administrative structure of the Mara church and the philosophy of apiepasaihna
hro contributed to church growth and Christian ethics in Mara Christianity.
[1] Kosuke Koyama, ‘Participation of
culture in the Transfiguration of Humanity: Forms of Ecumenical Theology’ in Asia
Journal of Theology, Vol. 7, No. 2, October, 1993, 219.
No comments:
Post a Comment