a) Right
to tax traders doing business within the chiefs’ jurisdiction.
b) Right
to freedom of action in relation to making their sons chiefs under their
jurisdiction.
c) Right
to help those seih (slaves), who were by custom not open
to redemption.
d) Right
of freedom of action in relation to other kinds of seih, who used to constitute the means whereby the chiefs could
cultivate and acquire the ability to sustain their villages in peace and in
war.
e) Right
to attach the property of their villagers when they wished or deemed fit, with
or without fault on the part of the villagers.
As
result of abolition of those rights, the Mara chiefs became the British tax
collectors, agents and subjects who were at their disposal. The chiefs had no
prestige and power in their own lands. On the other hand, it was better for the
Mara people in one sense that the government abolished the right of capital
punishment. In spite of this, some chiefs ruled their subjects with justice and
dignity, while there were some cruel chiefs who abused their rights. More
people enjoyed liberation when the government abolished the rights of capital
punishment of the Mara chiefs.
1.1.Circle
Administration
A
change of administration usually brings about social, political and cultural
changes in society. The British administrator introduced Circle administration
and the Maraland was divided into different circles and a circle inspector was
appointed to each circle to serve as a channel between the Superintendent,
Sub-divisional Officer, the chiefs and the people in general. Under each circle
an interpreter was appointed.
1.2.Impressed
labour
For
the proud Mara society, who had never been under any government oppression,
impressed labour was the most detested imposition they had ever experienced.
The Maras would happily complete any voluntary work on the basis of apiepasaihna
hro but culturally resented any
imposition or forced labour. Although it was termed as ‘impressed labour’ in
the government record to avoid ensuing later criticisms, in reality it was ‘forced
labour’ because it was forced by the colonial officers on the Maras to do this
except for the village chiefs and their officials. Village chiefs were
frequently asked to supply labours and if they failed to do so on time, heavy
fines and punishment immediately followed. While the Mara society was suffering
oppression and insult from forced labour, the missionaries praised the colonial
officers. To quote,
“The
British government deserved great praise for the energy with which they have
been opening up better means of communication in the hills of late years. This,
as all the government work, is done by the impressed labour. A message is sent
to the chiefs saying, “We want so many men, for such a work, on such a date”
and the men have to be supplied.”[1]
As
stated earlier, the Maras detested this forced labour but the British
administrators, to justify the issue of impressed labour used the propaganda
that ‘the Maras are savage, head-hunters and always giving trouble to the
British subjects and the British government was forced to annex their land’.
The
unexpected imposition of the Colonial rule in Maraland shattered the
traditional social structure and cultural practices of the Mara society and
greatly embittered the chiefs and the common people alike. But the colonial
divide and rule policy had considerable success in Maraland and paved the way
for Christian Missions which followed on the heels of the British conquest to
win Maraland “for God and Empire”.[2]
2.
The
Advent of the Missionaries and Cultural Changes
The
socio-cultural changes through the advent of Christianity among the Maras were
in line with the activities of the Missionaries (Lakher Pioneer Mission,
London) since cultural changes mainly took place by the preaching of the
Gospel. Maraland has seen a
lot of changes and development both positive and negative aspect throughout her
history. The coming of Christianity to the Mara people introduced them
to a wider world beyond their own. Christianity along with the gospel brought
many changes in their life-style, beliefs, ethical, moral and religious
thinking. At the same time, it also gave negative impact to the Maras such as
dishonest, corruption, and individualism. Young Maras are leaving traditional customs
and adopting new ways of life which are greatly influenced by western cultures
today, they mixed the western culture and lifestyle with the Mara traditional
culture.[3]
[1] Grace R. Lewis, The Lushai
Hills: The Story of the Lushai Pioneer Mission (London: The Baptist
Missionary Society, 1907), 43-44. Hereafter cited as ‘R. Lewis, The Lushai
Hills’.
[2] Reginald A. Lorrain, Five
Years in the Unknown Jungles: For God and Empire (London: Lakher Pioneer
Mission, 1912; reprint, Guwahati: Spectrum Publications, 1988), 18.
[3] Biak Cungnung, Encounter Between Gospel and Tribal Culture
(Bangalore: United Theological College, 1999), p.76.
No comments:
Post a Comment